top of page

Post-Holiday Recognition Debrief: 6 Questions for HR Leaders

  • holliechastain
  • 3 hours ago
  • 5 min read
illustration-team-celebrations

The holiday lights are down. The budget's been spent. And if you're like most HR leaders right now, you're already thinking about next year while trying to survive this January.


Here's what makes this moment valuable: you have fresh data about what actually worked. Your team just experienced your employee recognition program in action. Some people felt genuinely appreciated. Others felt like they got a generic thank-you.


The difference between those two experiences? That's your roadmap for improvement.


You don't need a complex post-mortem process or a 47-slide analysis deck. You need six honest questions and the willingness to act on what you learn. Let's dig in.


Question 1: Did we actually give people something they wanted?


This sounds basic, but it's the question most HR leaders skip. If you gave someone a $50 Starbucks card and they don't drink coffee, you might as well have handed them a blank piece of paper.


The companies getting this right are using platforms that let recipients choose their own rewards. When someone can choose between 400+ gift card options, prepaid cards, or lifestyle products, they actually receive something that matters to them. The options are endless!


Action item: Stop guessing what people want. Platforms that let recipients choose from hundreds of options solve the redemption problem at the source. When people pick what matters to them, they actually use it.


Question 2: Did recognition reach everyone, or just the desk workers?


At your facilities, how many people are at desks versus on production floors, in patient rooms, on delivery routes, or in retail locations?


If your recognition program requires a company email address, personal computer access, or regular Slack check-ins, you've systematically excluded the majority of your workforce. In the U.S., 113 million workers are deskless, according to Emergence Capital research. In manufacturing, healthcare, and hospitality—that's most of your team.


December probably highlighted this gap. The people at headquarters got recognized easily. The night shift workers? The weekend crew? The folks without email addresses? They may have been left behind, even though you had good intentions.


Action item: Count how many employees lack company email addresses. That's how many people your current system may not be able reach. Those are often your highest-turnover populations.


Question 3: How much time did we spend managing the logistics?


Here's the question finance will eventually ask: "How many hours did your team spend administering the recognition program?"


Think about December specifically. How much time went to:


  • Ordering individual gift cards from multiple vendors

  • Tracking down shipping addresses for remote workers

  • Managing spreadsheets of who got what

  • Handling employee questions and support issues

  • Reconciling receipts for finance

  • Dealing with lost or undelivered items


Many employee recognition programs don't fail dramatically; they fade away quietly. The biggest culprit is often complexity: when a program is too manual or admin-heavy, already stretched HR teams struggle to keep it running consistently, and participation drops off over time. To sustain impact, recognition has to be easy to give and easy to manage.


Action item: Calculate the actual cost. If two people spent 20 hours each at $35/hour, that's $1,400 in administrative expense on top of the recognition budget. Multiply that across 12 months and you'll see why "easy" platforms that require zero IT integration and take 5 minutes to use aren't luxuries—they're necessities.


Question 4: Did managers actually participate, or did HR do all the heavy lifting?


How much of your employee recognition came from HR directly versus from direct managers?


Recognition is most powerful when it comes from someone an employee works with every day. Gallup data show that employees say their most meaningful recognition usually comes from their direct manager, more often than from senior leaders or peers. When managers own recognition, it feels personal and timely. When it is owned primarily by HR or executives, it risks feeling like just another process.


If employee recognition was 80% HR-driven and 20% manager-driven, you've identified your adoption problem. Managers aren't using the system because it's too complicated, too time-consuming, or too disconnected from their daily workflow.


Action item: Interview three managers who didn't participate in recognition and ask why. Their answers will tell you exactly what's broken. Common themes: "I didn't have time," "The system was confusing," "I didn't know the budget," "I forgot." All of these are solvable with better tools.


Question 5: Did recognition feel consistent with our values, or like an afterthought?


Your company has stated values. Innovation, integrity, customer focus, whatever they are. Did your recognition actually reinforce those values?


Companies with strong recognition cultures, the ones with 31% lower voluntary turnover, tie recognition directly to values. When someone demonstrates innovation, they're recognized for innovation specifically. When someone goes above and beyond for customers, that's called out explicitly.


This creates a feedback loop. People see what gets recognized, and they do more of it. Generic recognition creates no feedback loop because there's no clear connection between behavior and appreciation.


Action item: Pull three recognition examples. Can you identify which company value each one reinforces? If not, consider creating reward templates tied to specific values.


Question 6: What would we do differently with no constraints?


Here's the most important question, and it requires honest imagination. If budget, systems, and approval processes weren't constraints, what would employee recognition have looked like?


Maybe you would've given people choice instead of predetermined gifts. Maybe you would've recognized people weekly instead of once at year-end. Maybe you would've made it easy for managers to send instant recognition instead of going through HR approval chains.


Write down those answers. Because here's the secret: most of those constraints are self-imposed.


You don't need enterprise-level budgets for effective recognition. You need transparent pricing (paying only face value with no hidden fees). You don't need six months and IT involvement for implementation. You need self-serve platforms that set up in 5 minutes. You don't need complex approval workflows. You need systems that trust managers to recognize their teams.


The gap between "what we wish we could do" and "what we actually do" is usually filled by tools that don't fit your needs. When you pick the right platform, that gap shrinks dramatically.


Action item: Take your "no constraints" list and identify which constraints are real versus assumed. Budget is real. "Our system requires IT integration" is assumed—plenty of platforms don't. "Implementation takes months" is assumed—some take minutes. Challenge every constraint.


The recognition system that simplifies everything


If these six questions revealed gaps in your current approach—and honestly, they probably did for most of us—here's what matters: you don't need to reinvent your entire recognition strategy. You need better tools.


Reward Builder exists specifically to eliminate the friction points these questions expose:


Choice instead of guessing? Recipients choose from 400+ gift cards, prepaid cards, and products.

Reaching deskless workers? Multi-channel delivery via email, text, or print/mail means everyone can be recognized regardless of technology access.

Reducing admin burden? Setup takes 5 minutes, requires zero IT integration, and the self-serve platform means HR isn't managing every transaction.

Empowering managers? Simple enough that managers can send immediate recognition without training or approval workflows.

Personalization at scale? Branded certificates with personal messages make every recognition feel specific without adding complexity.

Budget transparency? Pay only face value with no setup fees, no per-employee fees, no minimums, no contracts. If you order $1,000 in recognition, you pay $1,000. Period.


Many of our clients aren't running massive enterprise programs. They're HR leaders with approved budgets who just want to order rewards efficiently without complexity. Reward Builder cuts through all the enterprise software bloat and gives you exactly what you need.


Make next year different


These six questions aren't about creating guilt over what didn't work. They're about creating clarity on what to change.


The companies that improve recognition year-over-year? They're not the ones with the biggest budgets or the fanciest platforms. They're the ones who ask honest questions, identify real gaps, and pick tools that solve actual problems.


Ready to make next year's recognition program the one that actually works? Learn about employee recognition program best practices and see how Reward Builder eliminates the friction points most HR leaders discover in January.

bottom of page